He was likely testing both FesterвЂ™s competency along with that of his team, including his as a leader.ДЇesterвЂ™s insistence that the problem could be approached and that a solution was possible destabilized the group and led to anxiety amongst team members. Through presenting Fester with a problem that his team had previously concluded that no solution was possible, Knowlton was openly challenging an organizational underlying assumption. With the principle of his leadership challenged, Knowlton decided to seek employment elsewhere. The demise of the strength of morning meetings greatly diminished KnowltonвЂ™s confidence and authority as a leader, impacting KnowltonвЂ™s approach to the situation. Knowlton considered the morning group meeting a principle of his leadership. As team meetings were increasingly skipped, this important custom was in jeopardy. Knowlton was proud that his labвЂ™s work was guided and evaluated by the whole group. Knowlton felt far less secure if he had to direct the work out of his own mind he counted on these meetings to both challenge and reinforce his ideas. Question 2 Morning group meetings were custom for members of KnowltonвЂ™s lab and can be described as an organizational culture artefact. By using the collaborative approach to conflict Knowlton may have prevented the breakdown in the cooperative spirit seen in the group prior to FesterвЂ™s arrival. Although Knowlton did privately discuss the matter with two of his team members, he did not give them the opportunity to openly, as a team, discuss the issues. Avoidance ultimately led to the leadership of the group being taken over from Knowlton by Fester.ДЇester could have used a collaborative approach to deal with team conflict which would have shown respect for existing team members and given them the opportunity to openly discuss the issues arising since Fester joined the team. By avoiding the conflict team members were experiencing he may have increased frustration for all team members. Knowlton could have actively managed the conflict that was occurring within his team rather than exercising avoidance or withdrawal from the situation. Knowlton could have stated Simmons Laboratories theory of small research to Fester in confidence after the meeting.Д«y doing so, Knowlton would have increased common understanding and in a non offensive way informed him of Simmons Laboratories underlying theory, as lead by Dr. вЂќ By not addressing FesterвЂ™s comment, Knowlton placed Simmons Laboratories theory of вЂњsmall research teams being the basic organization for effective researchвЂќ at risk. Knowlton could have demonstrated honest dialogue without personal affront when Fester commented on team ideas, satirically describing how they led to a вЂњhigh level of mediocrity. He neglected to be open and honest with his team and with Jerrold, his boss. Knowlton had concerns from the first night he met Fester, yet he remained silent. We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically

Bob knowlton case